State v. Watkins’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 10141 · 42 U.S.C. § 2011 (Atomic Energy Act of 1954) · 42 U.S.C. § 2014 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 42 U.S.C. § 6903 · 42 U.S.C. § 6905 · 42 U.S.C. § 6921 · 42 U.S.C. § 6925 · 42 U.S.C. § 6926
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Hecht Co. v. Bowles · Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo · Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell · Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll withdrawals and extensions thereof ... having a specific period shall be reviewed by the Secretary toward the end of the withdrawal period and may be extended or further extended only upon compliance with the provisions of subsection (c)(1) ... of this section ... and only if the Secretary determines that the purpose for which the withdrawal was first made requires the extension, and then only for a period no longer than the length of the original withdrawal period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“were all it took to justify an extension, then Congress' restrictive prescription in subsection 204(f) would be reduced to insignificance. Indeed, DOE itself indicated a different understanding; its application for the extension cites the specific purpose of testing. Subsection 204(c)(2)'s reporting requirement further manifests that DOE misconstrues the subsection 204(f) instruction. That provision requires that the withdrawal report include”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that subjected the facility to RCRA regulation. The court pointed out that the radioactive mixed waste to be deposited at DOE's plant contains hazardous compounds such as carbon tetrachloride, mercury, and methyl alcohol that were regulated under RCRA long before the existence of the WIPP facility. Memorandum Decision Granting Permanent Injunction at 637-38. Using reasoning similar to that underlying EPA's”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.