Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 Ark. 256 - Hutton v. Savage

Hutton v. Savage’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2004
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2004 · most notably Lake View School District No. 25 v. Huckabee (2002), Schuh v. Roberson (1990)

22 state decisions

120198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hilburn v. First State Bank of Springdale · State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Nelson · De Moville v. Merchants & Farmers Bank · Goodrum v. Merchants & Planters Bank · City of Hot Springs v. Creviston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In each county the Judge of the court having jurisdiction in matters of equity shall be judge of the court of probate, and have such exclusive original jurisdiction in matters relative to the probate of wills, the estates of deceased persons, executors, administrators, guardians, and persons of unsound mind and their estates, as is now vested in courts of probate, or may be hereafter prescribed by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Additionally, § 6 of Act 14 of 1987 impermissibly authorizes circuit and probate judges to appoint masters or referees to hear juvenile cases with such powers as may be granted by the circuit and probate judges and purports to vest those masters or referees with all the powers and authority of the judges. As such, § 6 of Act 14 of 1987 is unconstitutional.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The italicized words [or may be hereafter prescribed by law] distinguish the jurisdiction of the probate courts from that of the county courts in the critical sense that the jurisdiction which may be vested in the probate courts can be altered by act of the legislature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.