Ragar v. Hooper’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Swofford v. Stafford · Talbot v. Jansen · First National Bank v. Newport Hospital & Clinic, Inc. · BWH, Inc. v. Metropolitan National Bank · Hooper v. Ragar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The motion shall be served at least ten days before the time fixed for the hearing. The adverse party, prior to the day of the hearing, may serve opposing affidavits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. Bard“We do not address the appellant’s argument that Rule 56 requires ten days notice of an intent by the trial court to rule on a motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. Bard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.