Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.1d 229 - Douglas v. Edwards

Douglas v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

298 F. 229 · 1924

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 1982
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1982 · most notably Edwards v. Douglas (1925), Albright v. United States (1949)

15 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

1401924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · Gould v. Gould · Slocum v. New York Life Insurance · United States v. Merriam · Southern Pac Co v. Lowe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . but nothing herein shall be construed as taxing any earnings or profits accrued prior to March first, nineteen hundred and thirteen, but such earnings or profits may be distributed in stock dividends or otherwise, exempt from the tax, after the distribution of earnings and profits accrued since March first, nineteen hundred and thirteen, has been made. This subdivision shall not apply to any distribution made prior to August sixth, nineteen hundred and seventeen, out of earnings or profits accrued prior to March first, nineteen hundred and thirteen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““We think it was the purpose of the statute that any distribution made to shareholders should be conclusively presumed to have been made from the most recently accumulated undivided profits or surplus, and that it was intended that the corporation should not be permitted to determine to what year or period or to what fund it would allocate such distribution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “from the most recently accumulated undivided profits or surplus,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.