Mason v. MacFadden’s Empirical Analysis
298 F. 384 · 1924
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1968
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Twin-Lick Oil Company v. Marbury · Johnston v. Standard Mining Co. · Speidel v. Henrici · Patterson v. Hewitt · Willard v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The doctrine of laches will be rigorously applied in suits involving property of speculative value, such as mining and particularly oil properties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holshouser v. Lee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.