Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.1d 614 - Barnes v. Andrews

Barnes v. Andrews’s Empirical Analysis

298 F. 614 · 1924

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2012

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

501924193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Briggs v. Spaulding · Bowerman v. Hamner · Hun v. . Cary · Kavanaugh v. . Commonwealth Trust Co. · People Ex Rel. Merritt v. . Tuthill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The plaintiff must, however, go further than to show that [the director] should have been more active in his duties. This cause of action rests upon a tort, as much though it be a tort of omission as though it had rested upon a positive act. The plaintiff must accept the burden of showing that the performance of the defendant’s duties would have avoided loss, and what loss it would have avoided. [Id. at 616]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the corporate funds have been illegally lent, it is a fair inference that a protest would have stopped the loan, and that the director’s neglect caused the loss. But when a business fails from general mismanagement, business incapacity, or bad judgment, how is it possible to say that a single director could have made the company successful, or how much in dollars he could have saved? [Id. at 616-617]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.