Gabrielson v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis
298 F. 722 · 1924
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1943
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on County of Mobile v. Kimball · Willard v. Tayloe · Pope Manuf'G Co v. Gormully · Gormley v. Clark · James Cathcart v. William Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The principal question here is whether the court was right in withholding from Gabrielson the equitable relief which he sought. We do not doubt the validity of the eontract. Hogans and Quinn are dearly bound by it. Their defense of fraud was not made out. They present no facts that would sustain a decree relieving them. But the fact that they are bound and liable to Gabrielson for the breach does not determine the character of relief that he may have, whether equitable or legal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Barr v. Carnahan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.