Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.2d 391 - Allan L. Hanson and Florence S. Hanson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Allan L. Hanson and Florence S. Hanson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
January 1985
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1985

8 federal appellate · 2 district ·

190196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Podems v. Commissioner · On Lee v. United States · F. M. Williams v. George D. Patterson, District Director of Internal Revenue · Osteen v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) traveling expenses (including the entire amount expended for meals and lodging) while away from home in the pursuit of a trade or business; * * *.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “albeit the expense is `personal in nature.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * Thus, the Commissioner's argument, and the Tax Court's holding, is that if a taxpayer is to take a two-day trip, the expense for meals is non-personal and deductible, but if he leaves in the morning and returns home that same evening, the expense for meals then is personal and non-deductible. 56 "Although discussing travel expenses while away from home (prior to the adoption of the 1954 Code), the words of the Tax Court in Waters [Kenneth Waters, 1949, 12 T.C. 414] seem peculiarly fitting to the present situation: 57 `”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.