Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.2d 739 - United States v. Thomas E. Robertson, American-Canadian Oil & Drilling Corporation, Thomas E. Robertson Company, Inc.

United States v. Thomas E. Robertson, American-Canadian Oil & Drilling Corporation, Thomas E. Robertson Company, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

298 F.2d 739 · 1962

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
July 1972
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Holland v. United States · Hirabayashi v. United States · Lawn v. United States · United States v. Crosby · United States v. Grunewald

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellants concede, as they must, that we must take that view of the evidence most favorable to the government and sustain the verdict if there is in the record substantial evidence to support it, sufficient to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.