Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.2d 810 - Hellman v. United States

Hellman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

298 F.2d 810 · 1961

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2005

8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

4019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2385 · 50 U.S.C. § 783

Relies on Scales v. United States · Noto v. United States · Nowak v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence was insufficient to support the indispensable finding that, during the period covered by the indictment, Hellman had the specific intent to bring about the violent overthrow of the Government as speedily as circumstances would permit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Considering these facts alone, or in conjunction with his knowledge of the Party's illegal advocacy, the activity portrayed is explainable on the basis that he intended to bring about the Party's ultimate goals through peaceable means.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]hey are as explainable on the theory that Hellman sought to effectuate only the Party's legal objectives as on the premise that he personally intended violent overthrow of the Government.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.