Bradey v. Ribicoff’s Empirical Analysis
298 F.2d 855 · 1962
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently May 1985 · most notably Laws v. Celebrezze (1966), Thomas v. Celebrezze (1964)
37 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Underwood v. Ribicoff · Theberge v. United States · Harper v. Flemming · 157 F. Supp. 473 - Remington v. Folsom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" * * * inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinite duration.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““For purposes of entitlement to a period of disability or to disability insurance benefits or to child’s, widow’s or widower’s insurance benefits based on disability, an individual’s impairment must also be expected to result in death or to have lasted or be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. An individual with a disabling impairment which is amenable to treatment that could be expected to restore his ability to work shall be deemed to be under a disability if he is undergoing therapy prescribed by his treatment sources but his impairment has nevertheless continued to be disabling or can be expected to be disabling for at least 12 months. . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The ultimate fact in issue; that is, Claimant’s ability or inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity, is not to be resolved, however, solely on the basis of medical opinion evidence as to this ultimate fact. Opinion evidence on this issue is without weight. * * * This is a matter for administrative determination.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.