Hom Sui Ching v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
298 F.3d 174 · 2002
Citation profile
26 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Poindexter v. Nash (2003), Vasquez v. Parrott (2003)
26 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Sanders v. United States · McCleskey v. Zant · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Stewart v. Martinez-Villareal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[WJhile [the] AEDPA restricts the writ of habeas corpus, it nonetheless “ensures every prisoner one full opportunity to seek collateral review.” And, it is only after the prisoner has used the allowance of one habeas petition attacking the judgment that the second or successive petition rule restricts his ability to lodge further attacks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.