Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.3d 414 - Gachot v. Stalder

Gachot v. Stalder’s Empirical Analysis

298 F.3d 414 · 2002

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Slack v. McDaniel · Williams v. Taylor · Miller v. Fenton · Fare v. Michael C.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “AEDPA only strengthens the stricture imposing a strong requirement of deference for a state court's findings of fact.”). Likewise, the Eleventh Circuit has noted that, after AEDPA, the federal habeas statute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.