McCaskill v. SCI Management Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
298 F.3d 677 · 2002
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph · Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis · Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At oral argument, [defendant] conceded that the agreement is unenforceable if construed to limit [plaintiffs] ability to recover attorney’s fees (provided she prevails) under Title VII. The agreement clearly bars the plaintiffs ability to recover any attorney’s fees, and because [defendant] conceded the agreement is therefore unenforceable, we need not proceed any further into an examination of whether Title VII’s fee-shifting provisions override an arbitration agreement. The verbal admission by SCI’s counsel at oral argument is a binding judicial admission, the same as any other formal concession made during the course of proceedings. The agreement prohibits the recovery of attorney’s fees in any situation, thus, based on [defendant’s] concession, we find that the arbitration clause is unenforceable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the attorney's fees clause, as well as two other contravening clauses, were not severable from the arbitration agreement as a whole — a claim not even raised in this case and therefore not before us here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“We are loathe to attach conclusive weight to the relatively spontaneous responses of counsel to equally spontaneous questioning from the Court during oral argument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.