Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.3d 873 - Mejia v. Ashcroft

Mejia v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

298 F.3d 873 · 2002

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited

28 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Iturribarria v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003), Mohammed v. Gonzales (2005)

28 federal appellate ·

480200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sangha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Melencio Legui Lim v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The BIA does not have the discretion to misapply the law, and it abuses its discretion when it does.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although de novo review applies to the BIA's determination of purely legal questions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “) petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.