Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 F.3d 880 - Stevens v. Rose

Stevens v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

298 F.3d 880 · 2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Adams v. Williams · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]n arrest is effected by the slightest application of physical force.” (quoting Hodari D. at 625, 111 S.Ct. 1547 )); Alexander v. City & Cnty. of S.F., 29 F.3d 1355 , 1365 n. 10 (9th Cir.1994) (citing Hodari for proposition that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We start with the basic proposition that a full-scale arrest must be supported by probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.