Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 FSUPP 609 - Coyle v. Gardner

Coyle v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2501 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 500 · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 556 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 559 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)

Relies on Berry v. United States · Pollak v. Ribicoff · Brandon v. Gardner · Leftwich v. Gardner · 207 F. Supp. 658 - Meola v. Ribicoff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 404.927 Conduct of hearing “Hearings shall be open to the parties and to such other persons as the hearing examiner deems necessary and proper. The hearing examiner shall inquire fully into the matters at issue and shall receive in evidence the testimony of witnesses and any documents which are relevant and material to such matters. If the hearing examiner believes that there is relevant and material evidence available which has not been presented at the hearing, the hearing examiner may adjourn the hearing or, at any time prior to the mailing of notice of the decision, reopen the hearing for the receipt of such evidence. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.