United States v. Jaeger’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · United States v. Bailleaux · United States v. Fagan · United States v. Domina · Barnes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hat discretion is abused only when the in-court identification testimony given is `so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable misidentification as to amount to a denial of due process of law. . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re RWS
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.