298 F. Supp. 2d 267 - Sever v. Glickman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Carter v. Stanton · Helfat v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc Ef · Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) in the person’s absence complete relief cannot be accorded among those already parties, or (2) the person claims an interest relating to the subject of the action and is so situated that the disposition of the action in the person’s absence may (i) as a practical matter impair or impede the person’s ability to protect that interest or (ii) leave any of the persons already parties subject to a substantial risk of incurring double, multiple, or otherwise inconsistent obligations by reason of the claimed interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because Feldman is not a party to the contract that is the subject of the litigation, he is not a necessary counterclaim defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.