Moss v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
71 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2703 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2711 (§ 201 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Vega v. State · Premo v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Relevant evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State · Favors v. State“relevant to show the nature and location of [Booker's] injuries, which corroborated the State's evidence of the circumstances of the killing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Favors v. State · Davis v. State“[T]he failure to make a meritless motion or objection does not provide a basis upon which to find ineffective assistance of counsel.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. State · Palmer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.