Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 GA 804 - Amos v. State

Amos v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · McDonald v. City of Chicago · Romer v. State · Wesley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a constitutional attack on a criminal statute may not be raised for the first time on motion for new trial. Even where an untimely constitutional challenge is addressed on its merits by the trial court, [we] will decline to entertain the issue on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there is no requirement for an attorney to prognosticate future law in order to render effective representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.