298 Ill. App. 3d 926 - People v. Fox’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 175 Ill. 2d 435 - People v. Woodard · 177 Ill. 2d 389 - People v. Reed · 163 Ill. 2d 93 - People v. Novak · 172 Ill. 2d 452 - People v. Robinson · 167 Ill. 2d 431 - People v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(b) Any person who is convicted of any offense under Chapter 4 of this Act, in addition to any other fines or penalties provided therein, may be required to compensate the victim, if known, involved in the related offense, for any loss that the victim sustains to his person or property. (c) The amount and method of payment of the compensation award shall be determined at the time of the conviction. (d) For purposes of this Section, ‘victim’ shall mean the owner or other legally entitled person.” 625 ILCS 5/4—108 (West 1996).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““In all convictions for offenses in violation of the [Criminal Code] in which the person received any injury to their person or damage to their real or personal property as a result of the criminal act of the defendant, the court shall order restitution as provided in this Mection.” 730 ILCS 5/5 — 5—6 (West 1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Hasprey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.