Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 KAN 342 - State v. Robertson

State v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McNeil v. Wisconsin · State v. Trotter · Winston v. Kansas Dept. of SRS · Trotter v. State · State v. Conley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n Kansas, there are four requirements to apply res judicata: (1) identity in the thing sued for; (2) identity of the cause of action; (3) identity of persons and parties to the action; and (4) identity in the quality of persons for or against whom claim is made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We will not permit his new motion to correct an illegal sentence to be used as a vehicle to 'breathe new life' into an issue previously determined against Robertson on multiple occasions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'(1) same claim; (2) same parties; (3) claims were or could have been raised; and (4) a final judgment on the merits.' [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.