State v. Hensley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “prohibit a court from imposing multiple punishments under different statutes for the same conduct in the same proceeding when the legislature did not intend multiple punishments.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Martin · State v. Crudo

2. “a crime where all elements of the lesser crime are identical to some of the elements of the crime charged.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Martin · State v. Crudo

3. ““ ‘the affidavit provided a substantial basis for the magistrate’s determination that there is a fair probability that evidence will be found in the place to be searched. Because the reviewing court is able to evaluate the necessarily undisputed content of an affidavit as well as tire issuing magistrate, the reviewing court may perform its own evaluation of the affidavit’s sufficiency under this deferential standard.’ [Citation omitted.]” State v. Hensley, 298 Kan. 422, 428 , 313 P.3d 814 (2013).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 51 Kan. App. 2d 514 - State v. Mullen