Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 KAN 531 - State v. Holt

State v. Holt’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bounds v. Smith · Specht v. Patterson · Entsminger v. Iowa · United States v. Selva · State v. Herbel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Adequate and effective appellate review is impossible without a trial transcript or an 'adequate substitute.' In the context of a criminal prosecution, due process requires a reasonably accurate and complete record of the trial proceeding in order to allow meaningful and effective appellate review. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must make the best feasible showing possible that a complete and accurate transcript might have changed the outcome of the appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the proper remedy is to reverse and remand for a new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.