Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 KAN 978 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

74 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State v. Ivory · State v. Maass · State v. Herbel · State v. Rojas-Marceleno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In addition to or in lieu of any of the [dispositions authorized by subsection (a)], the court shall order die defendant to pay restitution, which shall include, but not be limited to, damage or loss caused by the defendant’s crime, unless the court finds compelling circumstances which would render a plan of restitution unworkable.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'Sentencing in a criminal proceeding takes place when the trial court pronounces the sentence from the bench.' Once a legal sentence has been pronounced from the bench, the sentencing court loses subject matter jurisdiction to modify that sentence except to correct arithmetic or clerical errors. [Citations omitted.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Restitution constitutes part of a criminal defendant's sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.