Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 Ky. 360 - Lehman v. Patterson

Lehman v. Patterson’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
3
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co. (1959), Bentley v. Lawson (1966)

5 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

29019441950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pryor's Administrator v. Otter · Dixon v. Stringer · Ramsey v. Sharpley · Tupman's Administrator v. Schmidt · Roselle v. Bingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Upon testifying that she did not see the child until he stepped into the street, Mrs. Lehman was asked if she was looking on the sidewalk and she replied, ‘I was looking straight ahead where I think you should look. * * * I was paying attention to traffic. I was looking straight ahead. ’ In Dixon v. Stringer, 277 Ky. 347 , 126 S. W. 2d 448, 451 , it was written that a driver of a car who merely looks down a street in utter disregard of pedestrians on the street, or crossing it, will not be exonerated from liability by the ‘sudden appearance’ of a pedestrian, as any appearance is sudden to such a motorist. “ * # * The propensity of young children to suddenly dart or run into the street or road from the curbing must be anticipated by motorists when such a child is seen, or by the exercise of ordinary care could have been seen, on the curbing or the edge of the sidewalk. Roselle v. Bingham, 242 Ky. 496 , 46 S. W. 2d 784, 786 . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.