Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 Minn. 559 - Tyson v. State

Tyson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
February 1989
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gaulke v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Unless otherwise required in the interest of justice, any grounds for post-conviction relief as set forth in section 2.1 which have been fully and finally litigated in the proceedings leading to the judgment of conviction should not be re-litigated in post-conviction proceedings. [[Image here]] (c) Where an applicant raises in a post-conviction proceeding a factual or legal contention which he knew of and which he deliberately and inexcusably [[Image here]] (ii) having raised the contention in the trial court, failed to pursue the matter on appeal, a court should deny relief on the ground of abuse of process.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.