State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
64 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably State v. Stokes (1987), State v. Pinch (1982)
64 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. United States · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Pate v. Robinson · Drope v. Missouri · Bullock v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant is ‘aggrieved’ and ‘may move to suppress evidence’ under G.S. 15A-972 only when it appears that his personal rights, not those of some third party, may have been violated, and such defendant has the burden of estab lishing that he is an ‘aggrieved’ party before his motion to suppress will be considered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he conviction of an accused person while he is legally incompetent violates due process[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The record reveals that the able trial judge, in accordance with G.S. 15A-1002(b)(3), conducted a pretrial hearing, found facts, and concluded that defendant had the mental capacity to proceed to trial. That conclusion is supported by the findings and the findings are supported by the evidence adduced at the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.