Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 N.C. 687 - State v. Boykin

State v. Boykin’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably State v. Bondurant (1983), State v. Barts (1986)

59 state decisions

45019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Gregg v. Georgia · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Pointer v. Texas · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a general rule, voluntary admissions of guilt are admissible in evidence in a trial. To render them inadmissible, incriminating statements must be made under some sort of pressure. Here we quote from the Supreme Court of the United States in Hoffa v. United States, 385 U.S. 293 , 17 L. Ed. 2d 374 : ‘Neither this Court nor any member of it has ever expressed the view that the Fourth Amendment protects a wrongdoer’s misplaced belief that a person to whom he voluntarily confides his wrongdoing will not reveal it ... . “The risk of being overheard by an eavesdropper or betrayed by an informer or deceived as to the identity of one with whom one deals is probably inherent in the conditions of human society. It is the kind of risk we necessarily assume whenever we speak.” [A]ll have agreed that a necessary element of compulsory self-incrimination is some kind of compulsion.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The general rule is that a `statement of an accused reduced to writing by another person, where it was freely and voluntarily made, and where it was read to or by the accused and signed or otherwise admitted by him as correct shall be admissible against him.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.