Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 NW2D 173 - State v. Branch

State v. Branch’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 2000
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2000

10 state decisions

60198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Oregon v. Mathiason · State v. Reddington · Utsler v. State · Utsler v. Erickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any interview of one suspected of a crime by a police officer will have coercive aspects to it, simply by virtue of the fact that the police officer is part of a law enforcement system which may ultimately cause the suspect to be charged with a crime. But police officers are not required to administer Miranda warnings to everyone whom they question. Nor is the requirement of warning to be imposed simply because the questioning takes place in the station house, or because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect. Miranda warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person's freedom as to render him `in custody.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any error, defect, irregularity or variance which does not affect substantial rights shall be disregarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.