¶1Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto tbe following: “A question under tbe Constitution of tbe United States was presented and necessarily passed upon. Tbe defendant-appellant contended tbat bis conviction under section 270-a of tbe Penal Law of tbe State of New York was violative of tbe Fourteenth Amendment of tbe Constitution of tbe United States. This court held to tbe contrary.” [See 298 N. Y. 601.]
298 N.Y. 641
82 N.E.2d 34
People v. Beldegreen
Decided October 7, 1948
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1948-10-07
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1948
1 state decisions
Relies on People v. Beldegreen
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1948-10-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →