Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 P2D 407 - Hurst v. Byars

Hurst v. Byars’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2000

5 state decisions

20195619601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peppers Refining Co. v. Barkett · Burroughs v. Burroughs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under and by virtue of 42 O.S.1941, § 23, a mortgagor or his heirs may successfully institute and maintain an action to quiet title against the mortgagee, not in possession of the mortgaged property, when the mortgage lien has been extinguished by a lapse of time sufficient to bar an action upon the mortgage debt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.