Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 S.C. 272 - State v. Edwards

State v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
2
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably State v. Kelsey (1998), Johnson v. State (1997)

79 state decisions

4101989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Littlejohn · State v. Manis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “every circumstance relied upon by the State [must] be proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and ... all of the circumstances so proven [must] be consistent with each other and taken together, point conclusively to the guilt of the accused to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis. It is not sufficient that they create a probability, though a strong one and if, assuming then to be true they may be accounted for upon any reasonable hypothesis which does not include the guilt of the accused, the proof has failed.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “duty to submit the case to the jury if there be any substantial evidence which reasonably tends to prove the guilt of the accused, or from which his guilt may be fairly and logically deduced.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.