Gray v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2008
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thompson Ex Rel. Estate of Thompson v. O'Rourke · Brown v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Jenkins v. Dixie Specialty Co., Inc. · Smith v. QUATTLEBAUM
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A new trial] is required only when the court finds the [intentionally] concealed information would have supported a challenge for cause or would have been a material factor in the use of the party's peremptory challenges. The inquiry must focus on the character of the concealed information, not on the mere fact that a concealment occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) it is discovered a juror did not disclose a truthful answer in response to voir dire; (2) the juror’s disqualification is discovered following trial; (3) a truthful response could have supported a challenge for cause or could have been a material factor in the use of a peremptory challenge; and (4) the Gray criteria have been satisfied,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(1) the fact of disqualification; (2) the grounds for disqualification were unknown prior to verdict; and (3) the moving party was not negligent in failing to learn of the disqualification before verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.