State v. Richard’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited
1 district · 17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Salerno · Dombrowski v. Pfister · District of Columbia v. Heller · United States v. Cruikshank · United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. Wilkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The constitutional analysis in Beine was unnecessary to resolve the case and, as a result, is dicta. The dicta in Beine does not extend the longstanding precedent that limits the overbreadth doctrine to cases implicating First Amendment concerns. Richard’s case does not involve a First Amendment issue. Consequently, the overbreadth doctrine has no application, and there is no basis for holding that [the challenged statute] is facially unconstitutional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jeffrey“That the right of every citizen to' keep and bear arms in defense' of his home, person and property, or when'lawfully summoned in aid of the civil power, shall not be questioned; but this shall not justify the wearing of concealed weapons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dotson v. Kander
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.