¶1 ORDER
¶2 Carla Johnson appeals the judgment of the trial court convicting her of arson in the first degree. We find that the trial court did not plainly err in admitting testimony about previous calls to the police regarding Johnson’s actions.
¶3 An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).