Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 SW3D 644 - Grey v. State

Grey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin))

Relationships

Relies on Green v. United States · Beck v. Alabama · Keeble v. United States · Almanza v. State · Roberts v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a prosecution for an offense with lesser included offenses, the jury may find the defendant not guilty of the greater offense, but guilty of any lesser included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “has no discretion to deny " a requested instruction and situations in which "nothing precludes a trial court from submitting an instruction”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “In fact, the State can abandon an element of the charged offense without prior notice and proceed to prosecute a lesser-included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.