Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 U.S. 393 - Graves v. Texas Co.

Graves v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

298 U.S. 393 · 1936

Citation profile

156
cited by 156 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 14 district · 71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 156 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004 · most notably Smith v. Allwright (1944), United States v. Allegheny County Pa (1944)

21 federal appellate · 14 district · 71 state decisions — followed in 17 states

61019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Maryland · Nashville St Ry v. Wallace · Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell · Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. · Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Knox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 156 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The validity of the tax is to be determined by the practical effect of enforcement. To apply any other test of constitutionality would be to treat ‘a prohibition, which is general, as if it were confined to a particular mode of doing the forbidden thing.’ *. * * ‘It is immaterial that the seller and not the purchaser is required to report and make payment to the State. * * * The amount of money claimed by the State rises and falls precisely as does the quantity of gasoline so secured by the government. It depends immediately upon the number of gallons.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(r)esort may be had to equity . . . to avoid the multiplicity of suits . . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.