Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 U.S. 407 - Morf v. Bingaman

Morf v. Bingaman’s Empirical Analysis

298 U.S. 407 · 1936

Citation profile

173
cited by 173 later decisions
50
cited 50 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 173 later decisions (50 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2008 · most notably United States v. Carolene Products Co. (1938), SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros. (1938)

23 federal appellate · 79 state decisions — followed in 24 states

56019361940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John Hendrick v. State of Maryland · Frank Kane v. State of New Jersey · Graham v. Goodcell · People of the State of New York Ex Rel Albert Hatch v. Edward Reardon a · Clark v. Poor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[r]epeal by implication is not favored, especially where the one act follows close upon the other, at the same session of the Legislature”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not a forbidden burden on interstate commerce”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.