Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 298 U.S. 415 - Bassick Mfg Co v. R M Hollingshead Co Rogers

Bassick Mfg Co v. R M Hollingshead Co Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

298 U.S. 415 · 1936

Citation profile

307
cited by 307 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
October 1978
most recently cited

109 federal appellate · 33 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 307 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1978 · most notably Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. (1950), Lincoln Engineering Co of Illinois v. Stewart-Warner Corporation (1938)

109 federal appellate · 33 district ·

98019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedLyman Mfg. Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co. (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Carbice Corporation of America v. American Patents Development Corporation · Leeds Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company · Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co. · Underwood v. Gerber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 307 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question then is whether, by this method, the patentee, by improving one element of an old combination whose construction and operation is otherwise unchanged, may, in effect, repatent the old combination by reclaiming it with the improved element substituted for the old element. That this cannot be done is shown by numerous cases in this and other federal courts.” (Emphasis added) ( 298 U.S. 425 , 56 S.Ct. 791 , 80 L.Ed. 1256 )”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.