Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably Standridge v. State (2004), McConaughy v. State (1990)
39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crockett v. State · Irons v. State · O'ROURKE v. State · 18 Ark. App. 243 - Shaw v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The following periods shall be excluded in computing the time for trial: * * * (b) The period of delay resulting from congestion of the trial docket when the delay is attributable to exceptional circumstances. When such a delay results, the court shall state the exceptional circumstances in its order continuing the case. * * * * (i) All excluded periods shall be set forth by the court in a written order or docket entry. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hicks v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.