In Re Kauffman’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1003 (§ 4 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1056 (§ 206 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Doan v. Hudgins · Veale v. Citibank, F.S.B. · In Re Talmo · 635 So. 2d 1012 - Bd. of Pension Trustees v. Vizcaino · 580 So. 2d 151 - Alvarez v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CITY PENSION FUND
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.