Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 F.1d 128 - Newman v. States

Newman v. States’s Empirical Analysis

299 F. 128 · 1924

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2013 · most notably Sorrells v. United States (1932), Casey v. United States (1928)

41 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

1501924193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grimm v. United States · Goode v. United States · Webb v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . “It is well settled that decoys may be used to entrap criminals, and to present opportunity to one intending or willing to commit crime. But decoys are not permissible to ensnare the innocent and law-abiding into the commission of crime. When the criminal design originates, not with the accused, but is conceived in the mind of the government officers, and the accused is by persuasion, deceitful representation, or inducement lured into the commission of a criminal act, the government is estopped hy sound public policy from prosecution therefor.” . . . [287 U.S. at page 445, 53 S.Ct. 214 ]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.