Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 F.2d 119 - Young v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.

Young v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

299 F.2d 119 · 1962

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
May 1984
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently May 1984 · most notably Maryland - National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. U. S. Postal Service (1973), Quaker Action Group v. Hickel (1969)

33 federal appellate · 1 district ·

200196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French Laboratories · Benson Hotel Corp. v. Woods · Cox v. Democratic Central Committee of Columbia · Young v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellants recognize the general rule that a denial of a preliminary injunction will not be set aside on appeal unless the District Court’s action constitutes clear error or abuse of discretion, and that ordinarily this court will not consider the merits of the case further than necessary to determine whether that discretion was abused.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.