National Labor Relations Board v. Aurora City Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
299 F.2d 229 · 1962
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 1987 · most notably United States v. Staszcuk (1975), The Philip Carey Manufacturing Company, Miami Cabinet Division v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw-Afl-Cio, and Its Local Union No. 689 v. National Labor Relations Board (1964)
36 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Polish Nat Alliance of the United States of North America v. National Labor Relations Board · Salt River Valley Water Users Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Kearney & Trecker Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In attacking the Board’s jurisdiction, Aurora asserts that the doctrine de minimis should be applied to its purchase of $2,000 worth of materials, originating outside the State of Illinois. We do not agree. In National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co., 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 829 (1941), the de minimis doctrine was urged to defeat the Board's jurisdiction. In rejecting this argument, the court stated: ‘De minimis in the law has always been taken to mean trifles— matters of a few dollars or less.’ Id. at 832 . The time has .not yet arrived when $2,000 is but a trifle.” N. L. R. B. v. Aurora City Lines, Inc., 1962, 7 Cir., 299 F.2d 229, 231 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Our review in so far as factual findings of the Board are concerned is limited to a determination of whether or not those findings are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. * * * And, conclusions which are reasonable inferences of fact may not be set aside upon judicial review because the courts would have drawn different inferences.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.