Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 F.2d 254 - Malone v. United States

Malone v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

299 F.2d 254 · 1962

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 1997 · most notably Dillon v. United States (1962), Commonwealth v. Pingaro (1997)

22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

1801962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Hayman · Massengale v. United States · O'Malley v. United States · Cain v. United States · Dunn v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not the law that in every case where the movant may set forth a claim which appears to be good on paper although manifestly false in fact and frivolous, the District Court is nevertheless obligated to grant him an oral hearing. United States v. Thomas, 291 F.2d 478 (CA6); Johnson v. United States, 239 F.2d 698 (CA6), cert. denied 354 U.S. 940 , 77 S.Ct. 1404 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1539 . It is necessary that the movant substantiate his conclusions by allegations of fact with some probability of verity. O’Malley v. United States, 285 F.2d 733 (CA6); Stephens v. United States, 246 F.2d 607 (CA10).””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “raises a strong inference as to [its] invalidity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.