Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 299 F.2d 847 - Monnette v. United States

Monnette v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

299 F.2d 847 · 1962

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2012 · most notably United States v. Ventresca (1965), United States v. Frazier (2004)

48 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 11 states

480196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Jones v. United States · Johnson v. United States · Draper v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... It is argued that Agent Hillidge detected the mash odor only after an illegal search and the facts learned through an illegal search cannot justify the issuance of a valid search warrant. Agent Hillidge did go on the property of Monnette before he could definitely identify the mash odor. It is well settled, however, that a trespass upon the grounds surrounding a building does not constitute an illegal search. The protection of the Fourth Amendment does not extend to the grounds. Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 , 44 S.Ct. 445 , 68 L.Ed. 898 (1924), Martin v. United States, 155 F.2d 503 (5 C.A. 1946)." (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.