Anderson v. Hudspeth Pine, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
299 F.2d 874 · 1962
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 1983
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Postom · Gossard v. Watson · Martin v. Oregon Stages, Inc. · Johnson v. J. H. Yost Lumber Co. · Bailey v. Slentz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * [T]he evidence and the inferences that may fairly be drawn therefrom must be considered in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is directed, and if the evidence and the inferences viewed in that manner are of such character that reasonable men in the exercise of fair and impartial judgment may reach different conclusions in relation to the critical issue, the motion should be denied and the issue submitted to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the court may not pass on the weight of the evidence or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.