Goldberg v. Battles

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 8, 1962.

Decided March 19, 1962.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-03-19

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1981

4 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 196 F. Supp. 749 - Goldberg v. Battles

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1962-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stanford Shmukler, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

¶2Owen A. Neff, Washington, D. C. (Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Beatrice Rosenberg, Philip Wilens, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The district court ordered enforcement of a subpoena issued by the Acting Commissioner, Bureau of Labor-Management Reports, United States Department of Labor, directing appellant to appear and! testify before an official of the Justice Department conducting an investigation for the Department of Labor. We think the order correct and affirm based on the able opinion of Judge Clary below, reported at 196 F.Supp. 749 (E.D.Pa.1961).

¶6The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

AS
Austin Leander Staley
Chief Judge
William Henry Hastie
Chief Judge
William Francis Smith
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Stanford Shmukler, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Owen A. Neff, Washington, D. C. (Herbert J. Miller, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew J. T. O’Keefe, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., Beatrice Rosenberg, Philip Wilens, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellee.